| |
 |
Be Careful What You Ask For |
| By Curtis Kauffman-Pickelle |
As the dust begins to settle on the legislative action that has imaging center owners in various states of confusion, angst and anger, it is clear that no-one saw this particular train wreck coming. Questions remain at virtually every level of influence within the industry about who, why, what went wrong and what to do about these devastating reimbursement cuts.
READ MORE >> |
| |
|
| |
| Organized Radiology Plots Washington Course |
The diagnostic imaging industry’s lobbying priority for 2006 is clear, say representatives of industry associations and imaging center owners: Stop the Medicare reimbursement cuts for imaging procedures included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 from going into effect. But how? Now there’s the rub.To have any chance of having the cuts reversed or even moderated or delayed before they are scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2007, a legislative vehicle must be found said Josh Cooper, senior director of government relations for the American College of Radiology (ACR).
READ THE FULL STORY IN LEGISLATIVE REPORT >> |
| |
| Wall Street Weighs In |
As imaging center operators sort out their case mix to determine the potential impact of the DRA on revenue, Wall Street has already weighed in with its prognosis. Since the Senate passed the bill in late December, the Radiologix (Amex: RGX) stock went into a slide, losing 51% of its value by February 9: it has since begun the climb back. The day after President Bush signed the bill into law, the national provider of diagnostic imaging services announced that it expected the new law to have a significant impact on the company’s business and financial condition.
Medicare revenue represented 26% of the company’s imaging center revenue in 2005. Based on the provisions in the new law, Radiologix is predicting a $13.3 million hit in 2007. The fee schedule change is expected to produce a $10.4 million reduction, whereas the contiguous body part debit at the full 50% is projected to result in a $2.9 million cut.
Sole survivor of the physician practice management trend of the mid-1990s, Radiologix has been buffeted by high winds on Wall Street since going public in 1997. (Radiologix Redux) Could be the reason why, given the choice between Wall Street and Main Street, no other radiology provider has again ventured into the public domain. |
| |
| P4P: Hot Topic or Hot Air? |
The American Medical Association (AMA) took many specialty societies by surprise this week with the announcement of its pact with Congress to develop more than 100 standard measures of physician performance in 34 clinical areas. According to the pact, physician groups will have developed performance metrics to cover most of the services paid for by Medicare by 2007.
| |
"Medicare now pays the same amount regardless of quality.” |
|
| |
— Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa)
Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee |
|
The pact was signed and dated on December16, by Duane M. Cady, MD, chairman of the American Medical Association, and by Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Reps Bill Thomas (R-Calif) and Nathan Deal (R-Georgia). What is the likelihood of the AMA developing performance metrics for every code in the Physician Fee Schedule by 2007? Not great. However, it should be remembered that Senator Grassley was in the room when the radiology cuts described in the DRA were devised.
Our advice? Take the high road and button down your quality assurance processes. Be proactive, and work with organized radiology to help develop meaningful metrics.
Read More on Quality Measures.
Patients, Pixels, Dose: QC for DR and CR
http://www.imagingeconomics.com/library/200602-03.asp
What’s New in Quality Assurance for Computed Radiography
http://www.imagingeconomics.com/library/200410-02.asp
Digital Departure: New QA Era for Technologists
http://www.imagingeconomics.com/library/200509-04.asp
8 Quality Criteria for Mammography
http://www.imagingeconomics.com/library/200504-04.asp
P4P Primer
http://www.medicalimagingmag.com/issues/articles/2005-09_07.asp |
| |
| Consumerism and Radiology |
Diagnostic imaging centers are on the cutting edge of the consumer revolution in health care. And just as imaging centers have been the beneficiaries of the public’s search for a more comfortable and convenient source of radiological services, centers will also be the first to experience public scrutiny over costs. It is no secret that the matter of pricing in health care is a Byzantine affair, with a price for every payor. A lively exchange on this topic occurred in the letters to the editor of the February 28 edition of the Wall Street Journal. In response to a commentary that called on Feb 17 for physicians to post their prices, a physician from Vernon, Conn, asked which prices he should post: the undiscounted fee he almost never receives, or the reimbursement paid by HMO A, insurance company B, or network C?
| |
“Maybe I should post them all on the wall of my reception room much like the train schedules at Grand Central Station.” |
|
| |
— Robert D. Greenberg, MD |
|
How the movement for price transparency will play out in radiology remains to be seen, but radiology benefits management companies are beginning to lead the charge. Centers are well-advised to begin thinking about the very public notion of health care cost in their communities and how their costs compare to other centers in terms of value.
READ MORE >> |
| |
 |
|
|
 |
| |
Code Comparison Low-Down |
|
| |
The ACR has developed tables featuring the technical component payment
rates for each code under each payment system to assist imaging center
operators in assessing the impact of the DRA.
ACCESS ACR TABLES HERE >> |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Triple A Screens |
|
| |
The DRA of 2005 mandates that Medicare will begin reimbursing for
high-risk first-time Medicare enrollees over age 65 to receive an
ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). A code will
be in place by year’s end and reimbursement will begin January 1, 2007.
High-risk patients include men who have smoked more than 100 cigarettes
in their lifetime, and men and women who have a family history of AAA. |
|
| |
|
|
 |
| |
New Date for Capitol Meet |
|
| |
NCQDIS has rescheduled its Washington, DC, Members Conference for June
5-6.
Register: (877) 864-5400. |
|
| |
|
|
 |
| |
MARCH 9 |
|
| |
Radiologix 4th Quarter and FYE 2005 Results |
|
| |
Conference Call and Webcast
8 AM Central
Call: (800) 289-0494
Code: 6904462
Webcast: www.radiologix.com (from the "Investor Relations"
drop-down menu, click on "Conference Calls & Presentations") |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MARCH 9 |
|
| |
What Will the Move to Restrict Services Mean to You? |
|
| |
Sponsored by G-2 Reports
1 - 2:30 PM Central
Cherrill Farnsworth
President and Chief Executive Officer, HealthHelp
Don Lavanty, President
JT Rutherford & Associates
Cost: $277
Register Here |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MARCH 15 |
|
| |
ACR Update on the Deficit Reduction Act and the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2006: Their Effects on the Future of Imaging |
|
| |
Sponsored by RBMA
Pamela Kassing, ACR
Joshua Cooper, ACR
1 PM Central
Cost: $89 member; $159 nonmember
Register Here |
|
| |
|
|
 |
| |
Single Database RIS/PACS |
|
| |
Scimage introduces a single database, web-based RIS/PACS solution that is IHE compliant. READ MORE>> |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Clean Power |
|
| |
Staco Energy Products, Dayton, Ohio, introduces the UniStar IIILA serried single-phase online UPS, featuring protection over a wide input voltage range. READ MORE>> |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Portable Ultrasound |
|
| |
SonoSite, Bothell, Wash, offers the MicroMAXX™ hand-carried ultrasound system weighing less than 8 pounds. READ MORE>> |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|