| The
65-radiologist Austin Radiological Association is well
known for its robust information technology deployment
throughout central Texas. Nonetheless, the practice’s
billing department, which billed close to a million
procedures last year, was awash in the same paper that
plagues smaller, less sophisticated practices. Enter
Laura Casey, business office director, who partnered
with CIO R. Todd Thomas, and a team that included representatives
from both departments, to design and write software
architecture for an automated billing process that eliminated
processing paper.
Using an HL-7 interface engine, a document scanning
application that can retrieve text from a document and
export that data into a database, and an in-house software
engineer, Casey, Thomas, and team devised the new process
over a period of a year. And after an initial two-month
testing period, the results are very promising. Review
of the initial automated charge transactions indicates
the practice is within one percentage point of the previous
year’s collection rate, claims and patient statements
are accurate, and the billing staff has been reduced
by 75%.
To fully appreciate the achievement of the new system,
it is important to review the former process. “The
old process was all about managing our paper radiology
reports and patient demographic sheets,” Casey
explains. “We would touch each radiology report
approximately six times to manually key demographics
and charge transactions into the billing system. We
organized the paper into batches by date of service
and facility. Understanding that an entire hospital’s
date of service does not arrive to our facility on the
same day, but trickles in over a period of a week or
so, we had to organize the paper into batches by date
of service and facility and then wait until we thought
we had everything for that day. Our next step, to ensure
proper 76 and 77 modifier coding, was to alphabetize
the batch by patient name.
“The sorted and alphabetized batch was then reviewed
by a coder and coded the old-fashioned way; taking the
pen to the paper. Once the coder completed a batch it
would head back to the same group of people who sorted
and alphabetized it. They would log onto a hospital
browser, find the demographics appropriate for that
exam, and create more paper by printing the face sheet
from the browser. Finally the batch would move on to
a person who would enter the data into our billing system.
From that point the billing system ensured the claim
was on its way to the payor.”
“It took 20 people to create charges and update
accounts last year,” continues Casey. “Another
challenge rested with not knowing what was lost or missing.
It was really hard to know what we were missing. We
created a missing process, where we compared our billing
data quarterly to the hospital’s data to learn
which reports had and fallen prey to paper jams, empty
toner cartridges, or lost faxes. Our missing process
unearthed many lost pieces of paper, and it was effective.
However, when we received our new-found missing reports,
we had to process the paper through all that the steps
I just described.”
Clearly, the manual system was cumbersome, with many
potential failure points along the way. “The real
pain point for us was getting the charges into the system,”
Casey notes. “We knew we’d have to continue
coding them manually, and chose not to automate the
coding process with coding software, because the larger
cost burden resided with all of the people sorting the
paper, printing the demographics and then finally performing
the data entry.
ARA’s goal was to reduce all of that effort, and
to do it in such a way that would be scalable. The practice
had served Austin since 1954, and wanted to maintain
the same high level of customer service as it grows
along with the thriving city. So, the question, according
to Casey, was this: “How do we bill more accurately
and timely without incrementally adding the most expensive
cost to the equation: people?”
When discussions began internally about creating an
informatics-based fix, Thomas happened to be looking
at an HL-7 interface for another project he was working
on. So Thomas assigned one of three staff software developers,
and provided him with the HL-7 interface engine and
another product called Captiva, an application owned
by EMC that is able to scan text the off documents and
faxes and export that data into a data base.
“Technically, we had to marry the two pieces of
the puzzle,” Thomas explained. “We had to
figure out where we were getting the demographic information
from, we had to scan in the text from the radiology
reports, and then write logic that was matching the
demographics to the diagnostic report text. We send
all of that to a coder through an application that we
wrote in-house so that they could then, very easily,
go through and code the diagnostic reports. Then we
take all of that information out of the database, push
it through our interface engine, convert it to an HL-7
message, and upload it into our billing system.”
ARA chose to carve out of the automated process persons
under the age of 90 days, because newborns receive a
lot of services, and in the case of twins or triplets
the opportunity for mistakes rises dramatically. “Now,
instead of doing 100% of everything manually, the process
focuses our work on the exceptions. If there is something
missing or odd, then a human being gets involved,”
Casey notes.
As the new process was rolled out, some adjustments
have been made based on unforeseen issues. “When
you put everything together and start running batches
through the system, you realize, we need exceptions
for this,” Thomas explains. “We had to re-set
our insurance codes lookup to look for sample A, sample
B, sample C, for instance, because the hospital may
use different codes for the same insurance company,
or different addresses for the same insurance company,
or zip codes aren’t properly loaded.”
Having endured the process of building numerous interfaces
between the practice and hospital image and information
management systems five years ago, ARA decided to take
the project in-house. “Getting an interface built
between a hospital and a physician billing system,”
Thomas says, “the hospitals could never send you
everything perfectly formatted for a computerized system.
You were constantly relying on a vendor to make this
change and that change, and pretty soon the interface
they’ve sold you has been completely rewritten.
So after we went through that process six, seven years
ago, over and over again, we just decided last year
that we were going to do it ourselves.”
ARA’s new automated billing system is in what
Casey calls a limited-live mode at the moment, and she
is proceeding with caution. The first batch of 1276
charges that went out in June is about one percentage
point away from being completely paid and Casey has
noted only minor data and logic points in need of fine-tuning.
“We are moving judiciously toward 100% live production
but want to be sure that we don’t adversely affect
the company or our patients,” Casey explains.
““It’s not only the revenue but the
integrity of our data, which translates to the integrity
of our patient’s claims and bills. Although we
couldn’t have asked for a finer more talented
team to successfully create such automation, the process
is new and I’d rather be safe than sorry. ”
Aside from the ability to reduce staffing levels the
system offers many potential benefits. Reduction of
errors and expeditious posting of revenues are two large
benefits. “I estimate 90% to 95% of our charges
are going to flow automatically once they are coded,”
Casey says. “For the long haul, we hope to manage
only 5-6% of the charge volume with human intervention.
The opportunity to fall behind and the opportunity to
let things stack- up is a much smaller opportunity now.
We will become very current very rapidly, and then we
have a greater ability to remain in that position with
no additional staff even if our volume increases. By
the end of the third quarter the beginning of the fourth
quarter we will be sending out most of our charges via
the automated process.”
|