MITA Says ‘No’ To Medical Device Excise Tax

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
e-mail icon
Google icon

imageAlready operating in an extremely competitive global marketplace, imaging and radiotherapy manufacturers face a serious burden in the form of a new excise tax on medical devices, according to comments submitted to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) by the Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance (MITA).

MITA holds that the tax--mandated by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010--is so broad that it impedes manufacturers' ability to bring new devices to market. Medical imaging and radiation therapy equipment is often considered capital equipment because it is reusable and can last for many years, and the device tax brings to bear two problems associated with capital equipment, the association contends. The first such problem stems from the fact that medical imaging device users may choose to purchase service contracts that include replacement parts to maintain a device's functionality. MITA believes that the replacement of component parts of a machine that has already been taxed should not be taxed a second time. Moreover, MITA purports, the entire tax should not be applied at the beginning of a lease of medical imaging or radiotherapy equipment; rather, the device tax should be imposed on the final sale of the equipment to the end-user customer to match the tax expense with the sales revenue.

"The IRS must ensure that the implementation of the tax does not create an uneven playing field in which FDA-registered manufacturers are put at a competitive disadvantage when selling their products compared to others in the marketplace who resell these products," write the authors of a statement issued by MITA earlier this week.